June 9, 2007 1:59 AM
Growth of common vocabulary - part 4
How to control & bring order to the growth of semantic web vocabularies?
We raised this issue earlier in the discussion on web 3.0 thing vocabularies. We will address this again here with some findings and suggestions:
- Dave McComb suggested domain specific semantic standards in the white paper "The CIO's Guide to Semantics".
- Mills Davis has discussed business vocabulary as capability of semantic development that will allow search and access across any source of information in the research report "Semantic Wave 2006 - Executive Guide to Billion Dollar Markets".
- W3C working draft on RIF Use cases and Requirements suggests that implicit knowledge in RDF facts must be published along with the metadata to simplify maintenance of data and guard against inconsistencies. It is mentioned that RIF must allow linking of metadata and rules from different sources on the web like HTML links for web pages.
- This draft document also suggests that publishing mapping rules is a method to simplify access of divergent information models. This will allow progressive build up of mappings for Semantic Web.
- Meza-Aleman & et al. have identified three success factors for the semantic web: common machine readable formats, critical mass of users and enabling technologies. They have suggested finding an appropriate vocabulary on the web for common machine readable formats by the following of critical mass of users (popular vocabulary) and reuse this vocabulary. They have also suggested "international standards should also facilitate international communication"
We have observed the requirement and utility of the normative metadata definition by standards organization for common vocabulary in the semantic web application open market. Also the new context and synonyms of a 'thing' can be added as property and sub-property of a subject. A web service provider can avoid metadata mapping by including metadata terms from normative vocabulary for public interface.
|
Example: Tripple: DSL_broadband cost _:currency mapping to Tripple: DSL_broadband price/charges _:currency will be done automatically by the context mediator. Tripple: John vCard:homeTel "number" mapping to Tripple: John foaf:phone "number" will be done by the intelligent context mediator that is aware of vCard and FOAF vocabularies. |
Meza-Aleman & et al. have discussed that it may be impossible to enforce the use of a single common vocabulary in the wider web community. I would want to argue this statement by suggesting that delay in propagating the requirement and utility of a common vocabulary will make it difficult and probably impossible; in the absence of normative metadata many RDF vocabularies may come-up which may have to be reworked at a later time. Mills Davis has predicted the development of semantic web to continue from now until fourth decade of this century. As more and more applications are being developed there is not only a requirement but necessity for normative metadata. Meza-Aleman & et al. have proposed ExpertFinder initiative to find existing vocabularies, to extend the established vocabularies and reuse vocabularies. They have illustrated a requirement of mapping metadata from one vocabulary to another through a conversion function by application of SPARQL & RIF rules. In my opinion, too many vocabularies will limit the information access scope as more conversion rules will be required for newer vocabulary support. It will be comparatively easier to build a thesaurus based context mediator. If conversion rules are to be built in the web service application this may require web service enhancement every time it interfaces with a new web service application, keeping context and semantics out of a web service will make development easier and faster leaving metadata mapping and rule resolution to context mediator (semantic broker or service intermediary). The context mediator may find new web services with a different rule set by automated service discovery or subscription service. This will allow the new web service to integrate with any number of web services supported by the context mediator without any integration overhead. The awareness about existence of normative metadata as other semantic technology standards is a task to be assimilated.
The fourth European Semantic Web Conference was held June 3-7th, 2007, in Innsbruck, Austria. In ESWC participants were encouraged to use ESWC published metadata for all published information, this enabled use of semantic tools for intelligent search. The objective was to build semantic database and demonstrate the application of semantic technologies to the attendees in order to convince them about the abilities of semantic technology. This metadata is published as an official semantic conference metadata that is also being used by ISWC.
Reference: Meza-Aleman Boanerges and et al. Combining RDF vocabularies for expert finding. ESWC 2007



I am going to be blogging live from a couple of days of the
Leave a comment